These form my base archive and I guess it is defined as sorted chronologically. Having all these daily folders means there is not too many thumbnails in DT at a time. This makes for a bit of complexity but I group them monthly using the traditional folder hierarchy system (ie done by the operating system). So, in the background, do you keep all your photos in one folder with the tags stored in the metadata so that you can filter them that way, or do you manually sort them into folders?I use "Rapid Photo Downloader" which in it's default state (I think) creates daily folders. That said, loading got a little slow with some of the larger collections (when the collection itself contained a lot of images) - but it was nothing I couldn't deal with. Perhaps it's the case?Īlso, there are more darktable users/experts on, you might get more/quicker answers there.Interesting! My installation seems to be running fine despite having a lot of collections - which, to be fair, is part of the problem - as most of the collections are random file dumps. The G9 seems to have a similar mode called iDynamic. darktable doesn't seem to compensate the exposure as the other software: On Fuji cameras, we have the DR400 mode that underexposes the shot to retain highlights, then boosts shadow to compress the DR, and thus, the RAW is darker than SOOC JPG. Without your RAW to experiment with, it's like shooting in the dark. It should look like what I see in the FastRawViewer preview. This image was taken at 9:40 am on a bright sunny day. The difference is so great I'm finding the image uneditable. Is there some sort of preset being applied? I've not consciously created/saved any presets. It is not unusual for me to see a darker image in Darktable, but I've never seen anything this extreme. What I see in FastRawViewer when sorting:
I'm seeing something odd and different on an image I've imported into Darktable to edit.
0 kommentar(er)
